Friday 17 May 2013

Sons Without Fathers: Review


By Thomas Grantham


**** - Four stars out of Five.

A stunning adaptation of Chekhov’s forgotten masterpiece


When a teenage Chekhov wrote Sons Without Fathers, it was six hours long. It was never performed. It was never published. And it never originally had a name. Therefore, one would be forgiven - going into the performance with only this knowledge, as we did - for expecting melodrama to be high, existential pondering to come as a given, and the self-appointed slogan of ‘A Tale of Sex, Vodka and Shattered Dreams’ to be true in its entirety (teenagers, eh?).

Yet, whilst all these features were present - integral to the piece as they were - they were executed so well that you’d have kicked yourself for ever doubting it. Being a suitably ambitious adaptation from director Helena Kaut-Howson - the driving force behind the revival of Uncle Vanya two years ago, also at the Belgrade - the performance immediately grabs your attention from the get-go. Vibrantly-realised characters mingle believably with one another on-stage. Personality bursts from each drink of liquor and seething insult. Sweeping colours and visual cues do battle with a roaring soundtrack. Light shows dance. Lives fall apart. Laughter ensues. This is existentialism. This is melodrama. But not as you’ve ever seen it before.

Jack Laskey excels in the role of Platonov, a dark and handsome thirty-something teacher prone to alcohol, acerbic banter and the occasional extra-marital affair. He exudes the sort of misplaced confidence you’d expect a man like Platonov to have, garnering the appropriate amount of sympathy needed by his character as his life begins to collapse around him. Equally of note are Marianne Oldham - playing one of the many women who falls for Platonov without really knowing why - and Simon Scardifield, Platonov’s unscrupulous brother-in-law - often endlessly witty and endlessly drunken. Each character lends their own perception of life to the mix, and this results in an entertaining and entirely engrossing snapshot of the lives of Platonov and co.

That being said, the only gripe was that the play started to grate slightly towards the climax; characters continued to appear individually on stage to chastise Platonov, before leaving him muttering self-reflection to himself and the audience. This is probably no fault of the performance’s, though - if anything, it is Chekhov’s writing, and it soon becomes self-referential enough to reinvigorate the sense of enjoyment from the audience.

This is a fantastic adaptation of an equally fantastic written piece, and one that well deserves any praise it receives.

Debauchery has never looked so fun.

For more information be sure to check out:


No comments:

Post a Comment